Story of Glenanne Gang screening in Solstice this week
Screening at Solstice, Navan, this week, is 'Unquiet Graves: The story of the Glenanne Gang' which details how members of the RUC and UDR were centrally involved in the murder of over 120 innocent civilians during the recent conflict in Ireland. Narrated by actor Stephen Rea, it tells how members worked hand in hand with known sectarian murderers in the targeted assassinations of farmers, shopkeepers, publicans and other civilians in a campaign aimed at terrorising the most vulnerable in society. Now known as the Glenanne Gang, the group of killers rampaged through Counties Tyrone and Armagh and across into the Irish Republic in a campaign that lasted from July 1972 to the end of 1978.
The screening on Thursday night at 7.30pm will be followed by a Q&A with director Seán Murray, an award-winning ï¬lmmaker from Belfast. His recent ï¬lm, 'Fractured City' won a Royal Television Society Award at the BFI in London's South Bank.
He is also director of Relapse Pictures, a Belfast-based production company specialising in a range of work, including documentary and film. He has directed a number of testimony-based documentaries dealing with legacy issues pertaining to the recent conflict in the North of Ireland and his recent ï¬lm Ballymurphy was screened at a number of international festivals. Tickets: €10 / 9 (conc)
Director’s Statement:
In 1998 the Good Friday Agreement heralded a new era within Irish and British politics. Bolstered by the validation offered by referenda both north and south, the prospect of a shared future was greeted with great hope and optimism. The involvement of the Clinton White House administration created a greater international dynamic to the agreement with media outlets readily reporting the success as a template for other global conflicts. However, when the bright lights and media frenzy had calmed down, many difficult legacies of the conflict remained to be addressed. In particular, a growing community of victims and survivors suffer psychological trauma and social and economic exclusion from the effects of over thirty years of political violence.
There is now general acknowledgment that adequate government support was seldom put in place to tackle issues of conflict-related trauma across a broad spectrum of victims and survivors. In the absence of such support, the work of ï¬lmmakers has increasingly sought to address this phenomenon by highlighting issues concerning transitional justice; a task complicated by contested interpretations of what deï¬nes justice. For Unionism emphasis on the application of law, order and security tends to take precedence in these debates, while nationalists invariably stress the requirement of parity and social justice. Such agreements are further complicated by the role of the media, which for over thirty years has been far from an impartial arbitrator between the political ideologies of both traditions, habitually presenting a legacy of dominant narratives shaped by state censorship and control, both north and south.
I have had many influences on my journey to completing ‘Unquiet Graves’. The inspiration for such work can be drawn from a number of early ï¬lms that enlightened me to the power of documentary. The work of the late Art McCaig offered alternative narratives to the political discourse being beamed from broadcast channels under an atmosphere of censorship during the recent conflict, while television documentaries, such as Death on the Rock, (Roger Bolton, 1988) challenged the British state in its cover up of the executions of three Irish citizens in Gibraltar in March 1988. The exceptional investigative work carried out by the English journalists and ï¬lmmakers was later vindicated by a ruling at the ECHR that the killings breached Article 2 of the Convention on Human Rights.
Under the current political climate activist ï¬lmmakers have a duty and responsibility to both engage and contribute to the process of conflict transformation. The foregrounding of the personal cost to the horrors of our past offers an empowering voice to victims, one that holds no political authority but can be seen as both redressing the past for some and rebalancing a new historical understanding of the conflict.